Lok Adalat presided by the High Court Legal Services Committee, Chennai, settled a criminal revision petition and related civil execution matter between Balaji and V.R. Loganathan.
Rs. 1,90,000 paid by respondent; conviction set aside; execution petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, CHENNAI
Lok Adalat-I organised by the High Court Legal Services Committee
Thursday, the 18th day of July 2019
LOK ADALAT AWARD
(Chapter VI and u/s 21 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987) Presided over by
The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE A.RAMAMURHTHI(Retd.) and
Member
Mrs.Hemalatha Daniel
CRL. R.C. No.349 of 2011 (The Criminal Revision petition has been filed against the dismissal of Criminal Appeal in Crl. A. No.69 of 2010 dated 31.08.2010 on the file of Fast Track Court No.2, Salem, in confirming the order of conviction passed on the file of Judicial Magistrate Court No.3, Salem in C.C. No.2261 of 2007 dated 18.03.2010.)
Balaji @ Rajmohan .. Petitioner/Appellant/Accused Vs. V.R. Loganathan ..Respondent/Respondent/Complainant
On representation of the counsel for both sides, this case is taken up for settlement before the Lok Adalat. Both the parties are present. Mr.Ma.P. Thangavel, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K.T.S.Sivakumar, the learned counsel for the respondent are present. After mutual discussion, negotiation, mediation and conciliation between both parties, they arrived at a compromise to settle the matter as follows:
TERMS OF SETTLEMENT Both Parties were represented. They filed a memo of compromise.
sd/- sd/-
Balaji @ Rajmohan Counsel for the petitioner
sd/- sd/-
V.R. Loganathan Counsel for the Respondent
This Lok Adalat award is passed in terms of the above
settlement.
The full Court fee paid shall be refunded to the appellant
in the manner provided under Section 69-A of the Tamil Nadu
Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 and the Court Fees Act,
1870 as provided for under sub Sec.1 of Section 21 r/w 25 of LSA
Act 1987 as amended in 1994.
Sd/-
Judge Sd/-
Member
(*) Copy of the Memo of compromise is enclosed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To:The parties/Advocate concerned
Copy to:
1.The Fast Track Court No.2, Salem, 2.The Judicial Magistrate Court No.3, Salem 3.The Principal Sub Court, Salem. 4.The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, Chennai. 5.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras. 6.The Section Officer, Lok Adalat Section, High Court, Madras.+2 copies CRL. R.C. No.349 of 2011 BS(CO) SSM(14/08/2019).
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Balaji @ Rajmohan
V.R. Loganathan
Justice A. Ramamurthi
Hemalatha Daniel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
