Dismissed

Royal Sundaram Alliance v. Senthilkumar

Madras HC18 Oct 2019CMA/2488/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a Lok Adalat award where a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal challenging a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award was referred for conciliation. The appellant voluntarily withdrew the appeal stating the matter was settled. The Lok Adalat recorded this endorsement and dismissed the appeal, confirming the Tribunal's award. Full court fees were directed to be refunded.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed; Tribunal award confirmed; full court fees directed to be refunded to the appellant.

Royal Sundaram Alliance Vs Senthilkumar — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, CHENNAI

¶2

LOK ADALAT-I ORGANISED BY THE HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE

¶3

THURSDAY, THE 18^TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019

¶4

LOK ADALAT AWARD

¶5

(CHAPTER VI AND U/S 21 OF LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITIES ACT, 1987) PRESIDED OVER BY

¶6

The Hon'ble Mr.JUSTICE A.RAMAMURTHI (Retd.) and

¶7

Member
Mr.M.Sambasivam
CMA.No.2488 of 2011
Appeal against the Judgment and decree passed on 08.11.2010
made in M.C.O.P.No.181 of 2008 on the file of Motor Accident
Claims Tribunal, (Sub-Court) Mannargudi.
Royal Sundarm Alliance Insurance Co. Ltd.
Rep by its Branch Manager,
Sundaram Towers, 45 & 46, Whites Road,
Chennai City & City Civil Court.
...Appellant
Vs.
1.Senthilkumar
2.Sivakami
3.Karthikeyan

¶8

4.National Insurance Company Ltd., rep. by its Divisional Manager, 1754, Manojiappa Street, Thanjavur Town & Munsif

¶9

...Respondents

¶10

This case has been listed today in Lok Adalat. Mrs.Elveera Ravindran, the learned counsel for the appellant is present.

¶11

ORDER

¶12

The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal in C.M.A.No.2488 of 2011 pending on the file of High Court, Madras has been referred to Lok Adalat for conciliation today.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

The appellant makes an endorsement that “since the matter has been settled, the case may be withdrawn as not pressed”.

¶15

The above endorsement, is hereby recorded and the appeal is dismissed and the Tribunal award is confirmed.

¶16

Sd/-

¶17

The full Court fee shall be refunded to the appellant in the manner provided under Section 69-A of the Tamil Nadu CourtFees and Suits Valuation Act, 1955 and the Court Fees Act, 1870 as provided for under sub Sec.1 of Section 21 r/w 25 of LSA Act 1987 as amended in 1994.

¶18

Sd/-
Judge
Sd/-
Member
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(L.A)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To:
The parties/Advocate concerned
Copy to:
1. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, (Sub-Court) Mannargudi.
2. The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, Chennai.
3. The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.
4. The Section Officer, Lok Adalat Section, High Court, Madras.
CMA.No.2488 of 2011
RSV(CO)
CS/27/01/2020

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Royal Sundaram Alliance v. Senthilkumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Royal Sundaram Alliance v. Senthilkumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Balaji @ Rajmohan Vs v.R.Loganathan

National Insurance Co.Ltd., Salem Vs Mariappan

The Oriental Insurance Co., Ltd., Chennai Vs Jalka Beevi

Tmt.Selvi Vs National Ins. Co. Ltd. 74A, Paramathi Road, NAMAKKAL-637001

National Ins.Co.Ltd Vs Karthikeyan

Sri. S.R.Nanda Kishore Vs Mr.S.Lakshmipathy Naidu