Revision dismissed for non-prosecution. Petitioner's counsel did not appear despite listing for dismissal. Connected miscellaneous petition closed. No merit reached.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated 10.01.2019 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN Crl.R.C.No.224 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.No.2356 of 2018
Sivanandam
...Petitioner
--Vs--
This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Sections 397 read with Section 401 of Cr.P.C. against the order dated 04.11.2017 in F.C.M.C.No.74 of 2014 by the Family Court, Vellore.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Santosh – No Appearance
For Respondents : Mr.E.Kannadasan
O R D E R
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 07.01.2019, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and hence the matter was directed to be listed on 10.01.2019 “for dismissal”.
2 Even today, i.e.10.01.2019, when the matter is called for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, even though the matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal”. 3 Hence, this criminal revision case is dismissed for non prosecution. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/Assistant Registrar //True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
cgi
To The Family Court, Vellore.
+1cc to Mr. E.Kannadasan, Advocate, S.R.No.3124
Crl.R.C.No.224 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.No.2356 of 2018
RSV(CO) rrs 06/02/2019
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Criminal Revision Petition shall be dismissed for non-prosecution due to lack of petitioner's appearance.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sivanandam
Karpagam
V. Parthiban
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
