Allowed

J.Sayad Sameer, v. a.Riyaz Ahamed

Madras HC10 Jan 2019CRL MP/137/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In CRL.MP.No.137 of 2019, the Madras High Court disposed of a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking suspension of the petitioner's sentence under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court accepted the petitioner's undertaking to deposit the cheque amount and suspended the substantive sentence, granting bail subject to conditions.

What did the court decide?

Sentencesuspended;petitionerenlargedonbailondemandingabondforRs.10,000/-withtwosuretiesandreportingonceamonth.

J.Sayad Sameer, Vs a.Riyaz Ahamed — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Thursday, the Tenth day of January Two Thousand Nineteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr Justice V. PARTHIBAN

¶6

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.137 OF 2019

¶7

& CRL.RC.NO.72 OF 2017

¶8

J.SAYAD SAMEER [ PETITIONER ] Vs 1 A.RIYAZ AHAMED [ RESPONDENT ]

¶9

2 STATE REP.BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ERODE.

¶10

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the Memorandum of Grounds in CRL.RC.NO.72 OF 2019. on the file of the High Court, the High Court will be pleased to suspend the sentence of imprisonment imposed in the judgment dated 23.11.2006 made in C.A.No.25 of 2016 on the file of the learned I Addl. District Sessions Court, Erode confirming the conviction imposed in judgment dated 12.02.2016 made in STC No.454 of 2012 on the file of the Learned Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track Court No.I Magisterial Level), Erode, and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of the above CRL.RC.NO.72 OF 2019 [IN CRL.MP.NO.137 OF 2019]

¶11

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the Memorandum of Grounds in CRL.RC.NO.72 OF 2019 on the file of the High Court and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.R.VIVEKANANTHAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of M/S.M.GURUPRASAD Advocate on behalf of the 1^st Respondent, MR.G.HARIHARA ARUN SOMA SANKAR Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) on behalf of the 2^nd Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶12

The petitioner/appellant was convicted for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to undergo 6 months Simple Imprisonment and imposed with a fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default, to undergo 15 days Simple Imprisonment by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court No.I, Magisterial Level, Erode, under judgment in S.T.C.No.454 of 2012, dated 12.02.2016. The said conviction and sentence were confirmed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Erode, vide judgment dated 23.11.2016 in Crl.A.No.25 of 2016. Hence, the petitioner seeks suspension of sentence.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

2.It is represented on behalf of the petitioner/accused that the petitioner is ready and willing to deposit the entire cheque amount to the credit of S.T.C.No.454 of 2012, on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court No.I, Erode, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶15

3.In view of the undertaking given by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is inclined to suspend the sentence and enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the substantive sentence of imprisonment alone is suspended and the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on condition that he shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- [Rupees Ten Thousand only] with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court No.I, Erode and on further condition that the petitioner shall report before the trial Court once in a month, i.e. on the first working day of every month at 10.30 a.m., pending disposal of the revision case.

¶16

-sd/10/01/2019 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104. TO 1 THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT, ERODE. 2 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, [FAST TRACK COURT NO.I, MAGISTERIAL LEVEL], ERODE. 3 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ERODE [FOR INFORMATION] 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS. 5 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ERODE.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

+1C.C. to M/S.R.VIVEKANANTHAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR NO.1164

¶19

+1C.C. to M/S.M.GURUPRASAD Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR NO.1161

¶20

Order
in
CRL MP.137/2019
in
CRL.RC.NO.72/2017
Date :10/01/2019
From 7.2.2001 the Registry is issuing certified
copies of the BAIL/Anti.BAIL Orders in this format
MK:22/01/2019

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

J.Sayad Sameer, v. a.Riyaz Ahamed

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

J.Sayad Sameer, v. a.Riyaz Ahamed

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sankar Vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by

Jayalakshmi.K Vs R.Sivakumar

Ranjith Vs the Executive Magistrate Cum

Sivanandam, M/A.55 Years Vs Karpagam, F/A.40 Years

Mr.v.Kulothunga Chozhan, Vs the State Rep by Its

Kumaresan, Vs the State Represented by