Disposed

Shenbagaperumal v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Madras HC1 Nov 2019CRL OP(MD)/8954/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, through Justice G.K.Ilanthirayan, disposed of a Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The court directed the 1st respondent police to execute the bailable warrant against the 2nd respondent in a cheque dishonour case within four weeks and ordered the petitioner to provide the executant's address. No precedent cases were cited.

What did the court decide?

Directed 1st respondent to execute bailable warrant against 2nd respondent in STC No.1386 of 2017 within four weeks; directed petitioner to furnish address of 2nd respondent.

Shenbagaperumal Vs the Sub Inspector of Police — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.8954 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 01.11.2019

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.8954 of 2019

¶7

Shenbagaperumal

¶8

... Petitioner/Petitioner

¶9

Vs.

¶10

The Sub Inspector of Police Thisayanvilai Police Station Thisayanvilai,Tirunelveli District

¶11

2.M.Nambirajan ... Respondents/Respondents

¶12

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to direct the 1st respondent to execute the Bailable Warrant as against the accused / 2nd respondent herein and produce before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sathankulam in STC.No.1386 of 2017

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.J.C.Rathinavel Pandian For Respondents : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi No.1 Government Advocate(Crl.Side)

¶14

ORDER

¶15

This petition has been filed seeking direction to direct the first respondent to execute the Bailable Warrant issued by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sathankulam in STC.No.1386 of 2017 against the second respondent.

¶16

On the complaint lodged by the petitioner as against the second respondent under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in STC No.1386 of 2017, the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sathankulam has issued summons to the second respondent. On receipt of the summons the second respondent did not appear before the trial court and as such, the learned Magistrate has issued Bailable Warrant dated 29.12.2017 against the second respondent and the same is pending on the file of the first respondent.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

1/2

¶19

Crl.O.P.(MD) No.8954 of 2019

¶20

Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case, the first respondent is directed to execute Bailable Warrant issued against the second respondent in STC No.1386 of 2017 within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Further the petitioner is directed to furnish the correct address and location of the second respondent to the first respondent.

¶21

With the above direction, the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

¶22

Sd/Assistant Registrar // True Copy //

¶23

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS )

¶24

aav

¶25

To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Sathankulam.

¶26

The Sub Inspector of Police, Thisayanvilai Police Station, Thisayanvilai,Tirunelveli District.

¶27

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court.

¶28

+1 CC to M/s.J.C.RATHNAVEL PANDIAN, Advocate SR-95704. Crl.O.P.(MD) No.8954 of 2019 01.11.2019 CS(14.11.2019) 2P 5C

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

2/2

Shenbagaperumal v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shenbagaperumal v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr.Mohamed Siddiq Vs the Special Sub Inspector of

Pitchai Vs the Superintendent of Police

Premkumar Vs Sathiya alis savithiri

Rani, W/O.Sakthivel Vs the Superintendent of Police

Balla Steels Vs Sri Ashwini Agencies

J. Ravi Chanthar Vs the Superintendent of Police