Allowed

J. Ravi Chanthar v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC1 Nov 2019CRL OP(MD)/3806/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal original petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner sought transfer of a murder investigation from the local police station to the Crime Branch due to delays and lack of progress. The Court granted the petition.

What did the court decide?

Investigation in Crime No. 68 of 2014 was withdrawn from the local station and transferred to the Inspector of Crime Branch, Nagercoil, effectively directing a fresh investigation within twelve weeks.

J. Ravi Chanthar Vs the Superintendent of Police — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.3806 of 2018 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.11.2019 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.3806 of 2018

¶2

J.Ravi Chanthar ... Petitioner

¶3

¶4

The Superintendent of Police Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil

¶5

2.The Assistant Superintendent of Police Colachel Sub Division, Colachel Kanyakumari District

¶6

The Inspector of Police Eraniel Police Station, Eraniel Kanyakumari District

¶7

The Additional Director General of Police Crime Branch, Criminal Investigation Department(CBCID) SIDCO Electronics Complex Block No.3, 1^st Floor Guindy Industrial Estate Chennai-32

¶8

The Inspector Crime Branch Criminal Investigation Department(CBCID) Nagercoil No.7C, Kuringi Street Ramanputhur,Nagercoil Kanyakumari District ... Respondents

¶9

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to direct the first respondent to transfer the investigation in Crime No.68 of 2014 on the file of the third respondent police to the fifth respondent and file final report before the concerned Court.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Xavier Rajini For Respondents : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi No.1 to 5 Government Advocate (Crl. side)

¶11

ORDER

¶12

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a direction to direct the first respondent to transfer the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶13

1/3

¶14

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.3806 of 2018

¶15

investigation in Crime No.68 of 2014 on the file of the third respondent police to the fifth respondent and file final report before the concerned Court.

¶16

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the mother of the petitioner was residing at Paul Street, Neyoor, Kanyakumari District with two servants. On 31.01.2015 she was found murdered. Further the accused persons have stolen jewels and therefore it is a murder for gain. On the complaint given by the petitioner, the third respondent registered a case in Crime No.68 of2014 for the offences under Sections 302 and 380 of IPC. Thereafter the third respondent did not take any steps to secure the accused persons and as such the petitioner filed direction petition before this Court in Crl.O.P(MD) No.19530 of 2015 and this Court by an order dated 09.10.2015 directed the third respondent to file final report as expeditiously as possible. Even then the third respondent did not conclude the investigation and filed final report. Hence he has filed the present petition.

¶17

3. The learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side) filed the status report and submitted that so far they have examined some of the witnesses and also deputed Assistant Superintendent of Police, Kolachel to monitor the investigation. Further special team were formed by three Sub Inspector of Police to investigate the murder case and investigation is under progress, but unfortunately no useful clues could be obtained from the investigation.

¶18

4. Though the third respondent conducted investigation, till today they could not find out the real accused persons. Under such circumstances fresh investigation may be ordered to find out the real accused persons in the murder case. Therefore the investigation in crime No.68 of 2014 pending on the file of the third respondent is hereby withdrawn and the same is transferred to the file of the fifth respondent for fresh investigation.

¶19

5. The third respondent is directed to hand over the entire case records to the fifth respondent forthwith and on receipt of the same, the fifth respondent is directed to complete the investigation and file final report before the concerned jurisdictional Magistrate within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of case records from the third respondent.

¶20

6. With the above direction, the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

¶21

Assistant Registrar (CS-II)

¶22

// True Copy //

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶25

2/3

¶26

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.3806 of 2018

¶27

aav

¶28

¶29

1. The Superintendent of Police
Kanyakumari District at Nagercoil
2.The Assistant Superintendent of Police Colachel Sub Division, Colachel Kanyakumari District
3. The Inspector of Police Eraniel Police Station, Eraniel Kanyakumari District
4. The Additional Director General of Police Crime Branch, Criminal Investigation Department(CBCID) SIDCO Electronics Complex Block No.3, 1^stFloor Guindy Industrial Estate Chennai-32
5. The Inspector Crime Branch Criminal Investigation Department(CBCID) Nagercoil No.7C, Kuringi Street Ramanputhur,Nagercoil Kanyakumari District
6.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
+1 CC to Mr.S.XAVIER RAJINI, Advocate (SR-95586[F]dated 01/11/2019 )
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.3806 of 2018
01.11.2019 VB(14.11.2019) 3P 8C

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶31

3/3

J. Ravi Chanthar v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

J. Ravi Chanthar v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr.Mohamed Siddiq Vs the Special Sub Inspector of

Pitchai Vs the Superintendent of Police

Premkumar Vs Sathiya alis savithiri

Rani, W/O.Sakthivel Vs the Superintendent of Police

Shenbagaperumal Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Balla Steels Vs Sri Ashwini Agencies