The Madras High Court dismissed a Criminal Original Petition filed to set aside an impugned order of a Judicial Magistrate. The Court found no merits in the petition and no infirmity in the lower court's decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRL.O.P (MD) No. 6507 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 25.09.2019
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
CRL.O.P (MD) No. 6507 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.(MD) No. 4328 of 2019
Karuppasamy
... Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs.
Karpagavalli
... Respondent/Respondent
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to set aside the impugned order passed in Crl.M.P. No. 3376 of 2018 in M.C. No.2 of 2014, dated 25.01.2019, on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Srivilliputhur.
For Petitioner : Mr. P.M. Vishnuvarthanan For Respondent : Mr.M. Ashok Kumar
O R D E R
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to set aside the impugned order passed in Crl.M.P. No. 3376 of 2018 in M.C. No.2 of 2014, dated 25.01.2019, on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Srivilliputhur.
2.Heard Mr.P.M. Vishnuvarthanan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.M. Ashok Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent and also perused the material documents available on record.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (Cs-II)
// True Copy //
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS )
ksa
1/2
CRL.O.P (MD) No. 6507 of 2019
To
CRL.O.P (MD) No. 6507 of 2019 25.09.2019
CS(14.10.2019) 2P 5C
2/2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Original Petition filed to set aside the impugned order passed by the lower court is liable to be set aside.
Whether the order passed by the Court below is infirm.
Karuppasamy
Karpagavalli
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
