and when the same was presented for collection, the same was returned as ''in sufficient fund''. Thereafter, he caused legal notice and thereafter, initiated proceedings under the Negotiable Instrument Act, in S.T.C.Nos.865 and of 579 of 2012. Though the petitioner proved the case beyond the reasonable doubt, the trial Court acquitted the respondent, without appreciating the evidence. As against the said acquittal, the petitioner preferred the revision before the IV Additional District Judge, Madurai, and the same was also dismissed, confirming the order passed by the trial Court. He further submitted that the Appellate Court ought to have entertained an appeal under Section 374 of Cr.P.C. But, the Appellate Court has entertained the case as revision as against the acquittal order. He also submitted that the petitioner proved his case by adducing witnesses and necessary documents even then the trial Court failed to appreciate the evidence and acquitted the respondent herein. In fact, the respondent did not even elaborate the evidence by examining the defence witnesses and hence, both the Courts below erred in dismissing in the complaint lodged by the petitioner. Therefore, he prays for set aside the order passed by the Court below.
