Dismissed

Ramar, S/O.Mariappan, v. Allimalarvili, W/O.Ramar

Madras HC12 Nov 2019CRL OP(MD)/4417/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench dismissed a petition seeking transfer of a case from Sankarankovil to Madurai, finding no significant distance. The petitioner's appearance was dispensed with except for specific dates, and the trial court was directed to complete proceedings within six months.

What did the court decide?

Transfer of case dismissed; personal appearance dispensed except for specific dates; trial completion within six months directed.

Ramar, S/O.Mariappan, Vs Allimalarvili, W/O.Ramar — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

Crl.O.P.(MD).No. 4417 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 12.11.2019

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

Crl.O.P.(MD).No. 4417 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.(MD) Nos. 2684 & 2685 of 2019

¶7

Ramar ... Petitioner Vs.

¶8

Allimalarvili

¶9

Minor.Archana devi

¶10

... Respondents

¶11

(Rep. by through his natural

¶12

guardian mother/1^st respondent)

¶13

PRAYER: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, to transfer the case in M.C. No. 20 of 2014 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, sankarankovil to learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.G. Thiruvarutselvan For Respondents : Mr.C.KM.Appaji

¶15

ORDER

¶16

This petition has been filed to transfer the case in M.C. No. 20 of 2014 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, sankarankovil to learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai.

¶17

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is working as Senior Scientist in Bangalore and hence, it is very difficult to appear before the trial Court in every hearing dates. If the case is transferred to the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai it is very easy to reach Madurai and return back to Banglore, by air.

¶18

Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court finds no distance between the Sankarankovil to Madurai and hence, this Court is not inclined to transfer the case from the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sankarankovil to the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. The personal appearance of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

1/2

¶20

Crl.O.P.(MD).No. 4417 of 2019

¶21

the petitioner is dispensed with, except the dates on which, the trial Judge insisted the petitioner for his appearance. Since the case is of the year 2014, the trial Court is directed to complete the proceedings, within a period of Six Months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶22

Sd/-

¶23

Assistant Registrar ()

¶24

// True Copy //

¶25

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶26

¶27

The Judicial Magistrate, Sankarankovil.

¶28

The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶29

+1 CC to M/s.C.K.M. APPAJI, Advocate ( SR-97507[F] 12/11/2019 )

¶30

Crl.O.P.(MD).No.4417 of 2019 12.11.2019

¶31

ksa SDS (13.12.2019) 2P 4C

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶33

2/2

Ramar, S/O.Mariappan, v. Allimalarvili, W/O.Ramar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramar, S/O.Mariappan, v. Allimalarvili, W/O.Ramar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jamal Mohammed Vs The Inspector of police

R.Sangeetha Vs The Inspector of police

R.Sarojini Vs The Superintendent o fpolice

M.Balasubramanian Vs C.Hemalatha

P.Muthumaheswaran Vs M/S.Kumaraguru Auto finance

Navaneetham @ Navaneethan Vs the Superintendent of Police