Disposed

M.Balasubramanian v. C.Hemalatha

Madras HC12 Nov 2019CRL OP(MD)/12305/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court issued a notice of motion for notices in a criminal original petition seeking quashment of a domestic violence order. The court dispensed with the petitioners' personal appearance on the condition that they deposit Rs.5,000 as interim maintenance for the respondent's withdrawal of objection.

What did the court decide?

Notice of motion returnable by 04.10.2019; personal appearance dispensed on condition of Rs.5000 deposit for interim maintenance.

M.Balasubramanian Vs C.Hemalatha — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

CRL OP(MD) No.12305 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Fourth day of September Two Thousand Nineteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶6

CRL OP(MD) No.12305 of 2019 AND CRL MP(MD) No.7721 of 2019

¶7

1 M.BALASUBRAMANIAN

¶8

2 MINI ... PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3

¶9

¶10

C.HEMALATHA ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶11

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to call for the records in D.V.O.P.No.1 of 2019 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi, and quash the same as illegal as against this petitioners

¶12

Prayer in CRL MP(MD).7721/2019 :

¶13

To dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioners 1 and 2 in D.V.O.P.No.1 of 2019 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Paramakudi, pending disposal of the above quash petition

¶14

ORDER : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.S.BHARATHY KANNAN, Advocate for the petitioner, the court made the following order:-

¶15

Notice of motion returnable by 04.10.2019. Private Notice is also permitted.

¶16

2.The learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to inform the learned counsel who appears for the respondent in the trial Court, about the pendency of this quash petition, so that she can make arrangements to enter appearance before this Court.

¶17

3.The petitioners herein were only in-laws of the respondent. Therefore, the presence of the petitioners are dispensed with pending disposal of Criminal Original Petition, on condition that, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ they shall ensure that the first petitioner's son/husband of the

¶18

1/2

¶19

CRL OP(MD) No.12305 of 2019

¶20

respondent shall deposit a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) before 5^th of every English Calendar month to the credit of D.V.O.P.No.1 of 2019 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate , Paramakudi, as ad-interim maintenance, without prejudice to both the parties. On such deposit being made, the respondent is entitled to withdraw the same. For the month of September, 2019, the said sum of Rs.5,000/- shall be deposited on or before 18.09.2019.

¶21

4.Post the matter on 04.10.2019.

¶22

sd/-
04/09/2019
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PARAMAKUDI,
RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT
2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,
RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT
+1. CC to M/S.S.BHARATHY KANNAN Advocate SR.No.85422 (F)
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.12305 of 2019
AND
CRL MP(MD)No.7721 of 2019
Date :04/09/2019
AAV
PK/VR/SAR-4/10.09.2019 : 2P/4C

¶23

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶24

2/2

M.Balasubramanian v. C.Hemalatha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Balasubramanian v. C.Hemalatha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jamal Mohammed Vs The Inspector of police

R.Sangeetha Vs The Inspector of police

R.Sarojini Vs The Superintendent o fpolice

P.Muthumaheswaran Vs M/S.Kumaraguru Auto finance

Ramar, S/O.Mariappan, Vs Allimalarvili, W/O.Ramar

Navaneetham @ Navaneethan Vs the Superintendent of Police