Allowed

Dhanalakshmi, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC12 Feb 2019CRL OP(MD)/2181/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail to Dhanalakshmi, an accused in IPC cheating offences, who had previously been granted bail but failed to surrender. The Court imposed conditions regarding police interrogation and appearance within 15 days, dismissing the petition if she fails to comply.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner ordered released on bail upon arrest or appearance, to execute a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, appear for interrogation, and appear before the Magistrate within 15 days.

Dhanalakshmi, Vs the Inspector of Police — Cheating and Forgery | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Tuesday, the Twelfth day of February Two Thousand Nineteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

CRL OP(MD) No.2181 of 2019

¶7

DHANALAKSHMI

¶8

... PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.3

¶9

¶10

STATE REP.BY

¶11

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.7/2018) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT

¶12

For Petitioner : MR.K.M.KARUNAKARAN, Advocate

¶13

For Respondent : Mr.S.BHARATHI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶14

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶15

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶16

The petitioner was earlier granted anticipatory bail by this Court on 23.04.2018. The petitioner however did not surrender as directed. Therefore, the earlier order granted got itself worked out. Hence, the petitioner has filed this petition for anticipatory bail.

¶17

2.The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 120(b), 419, 420, 465, 468 and 471 of IPC in Cr.No.07 of 2018.

¶18

3.Taking notes of the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court had already granted relief to her, I am of the view that sufficient reasons have been given for the petitioner's non compliance of the order passed earlier.

¶19

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.2, Pudukottai, and on her executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner

¶20

¶21

shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

¶22

5.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate

¶23

within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

¶24

sd/-

¶25

12/02/2019 / TRUE COPY /

¶26

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶27

¶28

THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.2, PUDUKKOTTAI.

¶29

DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

¶30

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE DISTRICT CRIME BRANCH, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

¶31

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶32

+1. CC to Mr.K.M.KARUNAKARAN Advocate SR.No.2892

¶33

MS/VR/SAR-1/18.02.2019/2P.6C

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Dhanalakshmi, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhanalakshmi, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravichandran, Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

R.Ayyadurai, S/O.Rasu, Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

Santhi Vs the Inspector of Police

P.Pagan, S/O.Pambiyan, Vs the Project Direct Cum

Kumarvel, Vs Hindustan Petroleum

Epanechar Immanuvel @ Vs the State