Allowed

R.Ayyadurai, S/O.Rasu, v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Madras HC11 Feb 2019WP(MD)/2940/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking release of a seized tipper lorry. Court directed the Judicial Magistrate to return the vehicle to the petitioner as all conditions were complied with and vehicle was handed over to court custody only after the relevant date.

What did the court decide?

Judicial Magistrate, Keeranur directed to return the seized tipper lorry to the petitioner.

R.Ayyadurai, S/O.Rasu, Vs the Revenue… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶2

Wednesday, the Twentieth day of March Two Thousand and Nineteen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶5

WP(MD) No.2940 of 2019

¶6

R.AYYADURAI, S/O.RASU, NO.633, SITHUPPATTI, VILATHUPATTI, ILUPPUR TALUK, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

¶7

... PETITIONER in WP(MD) No.2940 of 2019

¶8

¶9

1 THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER ILUPPUR REVENUE DIVISION OFFICE, ILUPPUR, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

¶10

2 THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF MINES AND MINERALS, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT, PUDUKKOTTAI

¶11

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KEERANUR POLICE STATION, KEERANUR, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

¶12

... RESPONDENT in WP(MD) No.2940 of 2019

¶13

Prayer in WP(MD). 2940/ 2019 :

¶14

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd Respondent to release the Petitioners Tipper Lorry bearing registration number TN 21 H 5754 seized on 23.10.2018 and keeping under the custody of the 3rd Respondent by consider his representation dated 30.10.2018.

¶15

ORDER:

¶16

This Writ Petition is coming under the Caption “for being mentioned” on this day, upon perusing the petition and affidavit and order dated 11.02.2019 passed in this Court and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.K.Arunraj, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr.M.Rajarajan, Government Advocate on behalf of the respondents, this Court made the following order:

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

The case is posted under the caption 'for being mentioned'.

¶19

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner informs the Court that he complied with all the conditions stipulated by this Court. But the vehicle in question is not being released as it has been handed over to the custody of the Court concerned.

¶20

3.This Court wanted to know whether the vehicle was produced before the Jurisdictional Magistrate after 11.02.2019.

¶21

4.The petitioner's counsel states that the vehicle was handed over to the custody of the Court concerned only after 11.02.2019.

¶22

5.Therefore, the Judicial Magistrate, Keeranur, is directed to return the vehicle to the petitioner herein.

¶23

Assistant Registrar (CS III)

¶24

// True Copy //

¶25

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS II)

¶26

¶27

THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KEERANUR.

¶28

THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER ILUPPUR REVENUE DIVISION OFFICE, ILUPPUR, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

¶29

THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF

¶30

MINES AND MINERALS, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT, PUDUKKOTTAI.

¶31

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KEERANUR POLICE STATION, KEERANUR, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.

¶32

+1. C.C. to M/S.K.ARUNRAJ Advocate SR.No.55516. +1CC to The Special Government Pleader SR.No. 46336.

¶33

ORDER DATED :20/03/2019

¶34

ORDER WP(MD) No.2940 of 2019

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶36

DS/ /SAR- (20.03.2019) 2P 7C

R.Ayyadurai, S/O.Rasu, v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Ayyadurai, S/O.Rasu, v. the Revenue Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajarathinam @ Rajathi Vs the Inspector of Police

P. Mareeswaran Vs the Inspector of Police

Maharajan, Vs the District Collector

Ravichandran, Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer

Santhi Vs the Inspector of Police

Pandiyammal Vs the Inspector of Police