Disposed

A.M.S.Shikaputheen v. The Superintendent of police

Madras HC8 Nov 2019CRL OP(MD)/10423/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Criminal Original Petition under Section 482 CrPC sought police protection for the petitioners. The court directed the petitioners to lodge a fresh complaint on a fresh cause of action regarding threats, after which the police were to investigate.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to lodge a fresh complaint on fresh cause of action for police to enquire and take appropriate action.

A.M.S.Shikaputheen Vs The Superintendent of police — Madras HC (2019) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10423 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 08.11.2019

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10423 of 2019

¶6

1.A.M.S.Shikaputheen

¶7

2.N.Ahammed Ansari

¶8

3.K.Ajmal Khan

¶9

4.K.Ahemed Rassol

¶10

5.N.K.Asik Ahammed

¶11

... Petitioners

¶12

-Vs-

¶13

1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Superintendent of Police,

¶14

Thanjavur District.

¶15

2.The Inspector of Police,

¶16

Adhirampattinam Police Station,

¶17

Pattukottai,

¶18

Thanjavur District.

¶19

3.Mohammed Aslam

¶20

4.Mohammed Moideen

¶21

5.Abul Hazan

¶22

6.Mohammed Ansari

¶23

7.Ahmed Jaleel

¶24

8.Jareena ... Respondents

¶25

Prayer: Criminal Original petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to provide adequate police protection to the petitioners and their family members and consequently, direct the respondents 1 and 2 to forbear the respondent No.3 to 8 in anyway interfering with the peaceful life of the petitioner without any hindrance.

¶26

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Lajapathi Roy

¶27

For R1 and R2 : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi Government Advocate(Crl.side)

¶28

O R D E R

¶29

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the first and second respondents to provide adequate police protection to the petitioners and their family members and also direct them to forbear the respondent No.3 to 8 in anyway interfering with the peaceful life of the petitioner without any hindrance.

¶30

2.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit that on the complaint lodged by the petitioners, the second respondent registered a case in Crime No.103 of 2019 for the offence under Sections 147, 120(b), 406 and 420 of IPC as against the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶31

1/2

¶32

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10423 of 2019

¶33

accused persons.

¶34

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that petitioners are threatened by the accused persons to withdraw the said complaint.

¶35

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners are directed to lodge a fresh complaint on fresh cause of action and on receipt of the same, the second respondent is directed to enquire the same and take appropriate action on the complaint lodged by the petitioners.

¶36

4.With above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

¶37

Sd/Assistant Registrar (CS III) // True Copy //

¶38

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶39

das

¶40

¶41

1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District.

¶42

2.The Inspector of Police, Adhirampattinam Police Station, Pattukottai, Thanjavur District.

¶43

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶44

+1 CC to M/s.T. LAJAPATHY ROY, Advocate ( SR-97962[F] dated 13/11/2019 )

¶45

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10423 of 2019 08.11.2019

¶46

KK/SAR/27.11.2019/2P-5C/

¶47

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶48

2/2

A.M.S.Shikaputheen v. The Superintendent of police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.M.S.Shikaputheen v. The Superintendent of police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Ananntha Srinivasan Vs The Inspector of Police

Jayalakshmi, Vs the Inspector of Police

Raj Narayanan Vs The Sub Inspector of Police

Mohammed Rasool, Vs the Inspector of Police

S.Arul Prasad Vs the Inspector of Police

A.Chinna Chellaiah Konar, Vs the Inspector of Police