Raj Narayanan v. The Sub Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court quash of FIR petition dismissed trial commenced six months for completion personal appearance dispensed.
What did the court decide?
Trial court directed to complete trial within six months; personal appearance of petitioners dispensed except when trial judge insists.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 07.11.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.(MD).No.16134 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.(MD).Nos.9601 and 9603 of 2019
1.Raj Narayanan
- 2.Ganesan
- 3.Krishnaveni
- 4.Gogila
- 5.Sathishkumar
6.Raj Kumar ... Petitioners/Accused Nos. 1 to 6 Vs.
- State represented by The Sub Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondent/Complainant
2.Karthiga ... Respondents/Defacto Complainant
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Original Petition seeking quashement of charge sheet can be granted after the trial has commenced.
Whether the trial court is directed to complete the trial within a specified period.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Raj Narayanan
- petitioner
Raj Kumar
- respondent
State
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court