Dismissed

T.Subramani v. v.N.Nazar

Madras HC13 Feb 2019CRL OP/951/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners approached the High Court of Judicature at Madras under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash criminal proceedings for offences under Sections 138, 420 IPC, and Section 200 Cr.P.C. The Court dismissed the petition, holding that specific allegations required a trial and proceedings could not be quashed.

What did the court decide?

The Criminal Original Petition and connected miscellaneous petitions were dismissed and closed.

T.Subramani Vs v.N.Nazar — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 13.02.2019

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.951 of 2014 and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2014

¶6

1.T.Subramani

¶7

2.M/s.Nallam Maniam Textiles (P) Ltd.,

¶8

Rep. by its Managing Director, T.Subramani,

¶9

1850/C, Erahampatti, Ottanchatram Road, Dharapuram - 638 673. ... Petitioners/Accused No.1 & 2

¶10

Vs. V.N.Nazar ... Respondent/Complainant

¶11

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to call for the records relating to C.C.No.237 of 2011 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Villupuram and quash the same.

¶12

For Petitioners : No Appearance

¶13

ORDER

¶14

This petition has been filed to call for the records relating to C.C.No.237 of 2011 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.1, Villupuram and quash the same.

¶15

The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Without any base, the case has been registered for the offences under Sections 138 & 142 of Negotiable Instruments Act r/w Section 200 of Criminal Procedure Code and Section 420 I.P.C., as against the petitioners. Hence he prayed to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.237 of 2011.

¶16

It is seen from the complaint that there are specific allegations as against the petitioners, and trial has to be conducted as such this Court cannot quash the entire proceedings in the above case.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

In view of the above discussion, this Court is not inclined to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.237 of 2011 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Villupuram.

¶19

Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is
dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are
closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS IV)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
pds/lok
To
The Judicial Magistrate Court No.1,
Villupuram.
Copy To: The Section Officer,
Criminal Section, High Court, Madras.
Crl.O.P.No.951 of 2014
and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2014
SSV(CO)
CSL/22.03.2019

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

T.Subramani v. v.N.Nazar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Subramani v. v.N.Nazar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammed Kasim Vs the Superintendent of Police

M.Rajkumar Vs the Superintendent of Police

M.Amala Vs the Inspector of Police

Thulasi @ Ayyappan Vs State Rep. by

Thulasi @ Ayyappan Vs State Rep. by

A.Kandasamy Vs State of Rep. by