The Honble Court dismissed a Criminal Original Petition seeking to dispense with personal appearance as infructuous, having been informed by the Prosecution that the trial under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was already completed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 13.02.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
Crl.O.P.No.14789 of 2015 1.Thulasi @ Ayyappan 2.Deepan @ Manikandan ... Petitioners Vs. State rep. by SHO – Mudaliarpet Police Station, Mudaliarpet, Puducherry ...Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to dispense with the personal appearance of the petitioners – (1.Thulasi @ Ayyappan – A1 and 2.Deepan @ Manikandan-A2) in the PRC.No.32/2014 on the file of Judicial Magistrate-III, Puducherry (Old PRC No.31 of 2005 on the file of Judicial Magistrate-I). For Petitioners: No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.V.Balamurugan, Additional Public Prosecutor (Puducherry) ORDER The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Puducherry) would submit that trial in the above case has already been completed. 2. In view of the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous. pds/lok Sd/Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar
To
+1cc to The Additional Public Prosecutor, Puducherry
SR.NO.13694
Crl.O.P.No.14789 of 2015
Kak(20/03/2019)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
1.Thulasi @ Ayyappan
2.Deepan @ Manikandan
State rep. by SHO – Mudaliarpet Police Station
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
