C.Rose v. State by
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought permission to withdraw a Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. wishing to quash an FIR, and granted the withdrawal amidst the clarification below, asserting the endpoint. Thus dismissing it as withdrew.
What did the court decide?
The Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.11.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
Crl.O.P.No.29716 of 2019
C.Rose ...Petitioner
Vs
State by The Inspector of Police, Uthiramerur Police Station, Kancheepuram District. ...Respondent
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, pleased to quash the FIR in Crime No.412 of 2017 pending on the file of the respondent police.
For Petitioners: Mr.L.Ramu
For Respondent : Mr.C.Iyyapparaj
Additional Public Prosecutor O R D E R Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Original Petition for quashing the FIR can be withdrawn by the petitioner.
What is the consequence of withdrawing the Criminal Original Petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C.Rose
- respondent
State
Coram
M.S. RAMESH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court