A criminal original petition filed under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed as infructuous by the Madras High Court after the Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the complaint had registered in a crime number. The petitioner sought action on an earlier complaint.
Direction to the second respondent to take action on the complaint was denied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09.12.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM
Crl.O.P.No.25071 of 2019
P.Thangeswaran
...Petitioner
-Vs-
Prayer: Criminal Original petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the second respondent to take necessary and further action on the petitioner's complaint dated 01.09.2019 vide in C.S.R.No.90 of 2019 dated 01.09.2019 on the file of the second respondent herein.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Ramesh For Respondents : Mr.M.C.Iyyappa Raj Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the second respondent to take necessary and further action on the petitioner's complaint dated 01.09.2019 vide in C.S.R.No.90 of 2019 dated 01.09.2019 on the file of the second respondent herein.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the respondent police officer to take further action on the petitioner's complaint as sought in this petition.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P. Thangeswaran
The Superintendent of Police, Salem District
The Inspector of Police, Thampampatti Police Station
P. Rajamanickam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
