Dismissed

R.Jayakumar v. Inspector of Police

Madras HC16 Sept 2019CRL OP/24836/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Criminal Original Petition seeking quashing of a complaint under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was dismissed. The Court observed that grounds could be adjudicated during the trial and directed the trial court to complete proceedings within six months.

What did the court decide?

The trial court was directed to complete the proceedings in C.C.No.16279 of 2006 within six months. The criminal original petition and connected miscellaneous petitions stand closed.

R.Jayakumar Vs Inspector of Police — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 16.09.2019

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH

¶5

Crl.O.P No.24836 of 2019 and Crl.M.P Nos.13249 & 13250 of 2019

¶6

R.Jayakumar .. Petitioner Vs.

¶7

Inspector of Police, C.C.I.W. CID, Alandur Road, Thiru Vi Ka Industrial Estate, SIDCO Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 032.

¶8

Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records in C.C.No.16279 of 2006 on the file of XVI Metropolitan Magistrate,George Town, Chennai 600 001 and to quash the same as against the petitioner herein.

¶9

Though the petitioner herein has raised several grounds challenging the final report filed in the year 2016, this Court is of the view that all these grounds could be established in the course of trial and that there may not be proper ground for quashing the complaint at this stage. This Court is not entitled to go into the merits raised by the petitioner since the same is appearing before the trial Court.

¶10

3.Nevertheless, if the trial Court is called up on to complete the proceedings within a stipulated time, ends of justice could be secured.

¶11

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶12

4.In the light of the above observation, the learned XVI Metropolitan Magistrate, George Town, Chennai-1 shall endeavor to complete the proceedings in C.C.No.16279 of 2006 within a period of six months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶13

5.With the above observation, this criminal original petition stands closed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶14

-s/d-
Assistant Registrar(CCC)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
ssr/bkn
To
1. The XVI Metropolitan Magistrate,
George Town, Chennai 600 001.
2. The Inspector of Police,
C.C.I.W. CID,
Alandur Road,
Thiru Vi Ka Industrial Estate,
SIDCO Industrial Estate, Guindy,
Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600 032.
3.The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
+1 CC to Mr.A.S.Baalaji, Advocate sr 79278.
Crl.O.P No.24836 of 2019
and Crl.M.P Nos.13249 & 13250 of 2019
BR(CO)
SP(24/10/2019)

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Jayakumar v. Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Jayakumar v. Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Divya Vs the Inspector of Police

Nageswari (F/a 40 Yrs) Vs Sudhakar

Ashok Sachdev Vs the Secretary

Senthamizhselvan Vs the State Rep.by

E.Perumal Vs the Inspector of Police

Tmt.Dhanam Vs state of Tamil Nadu Rep by its