T.Meena v. Seeralan
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a Criminal Original Petition seeking to set aside an order condoning a 177-day delay in filing a complaint. The Court found no merit and dismissed the petition, closing the connected Miscellaneous Petition.
What did the court decide?
Criminal Original Petition dismissed and connected Criminal Miscellaneous Petition closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 18.02.2019
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
Crl.O.P.No.2146 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.No.1354 of 2019
Tmt.T. Meena .. Petitioner
/Vs/
Seeralan ...Respondent
Prayer:
Criminal Original Petition filed under section 482 of
Criminal Procedure Code, to call for the records in
Crl.M.P.NO.4421 of 2015 dated 26.06.2018 on the file of the
Judicial Magistrate-I, Dharmapuri, to set aside the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.C.Vishwanth
For Respondent : No Appearance
* * * * *
O R D E R
This petition is filed by the petitioner to set aside the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.4421 of 2015, dated 26.06.2018 by the learned Judicial Magistrate - I, Dharmapuri, thereby allowing the petition to condone the delay of 177 days in filing the complaint.
2.Though the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner pointed out that several discrepancies were found in the order passed by the Trial Court to condone the delay of 177 days in filing the complaint. However, all the points raised by the petitioner can be considered while the main complaint is taken on file. Therefore, this Court finds no merits in this petition.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should set aside the impugned order allowing condonation of delay in filing a criminal complaint.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Tmt.T. Meena
- respondent
Seeralan
Coram
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court