Partly allowed

S.Vimal Sekar@Vimala Sekar v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC18 Feb 2019CRL MP(MD)/1324/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court considered a petition to relax a condition imposed in a prior criminal order. The court found the petitioner was complying regularly and, noting that investigation was pending, modified the reporting frequency to every Monday and Friday.

What did the court decide?

The condition in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.22041/2018 is modified; the petitioner shall report before the respondent police on every Monday and Friday at 10.30 a.m.

S.Vimal Sekar@Vimala Sekar Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Monday, the Eighteenth day of February Two Thousand Nineteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

CRL MP(MD) No.1324 of 2019 IN CRL OP(MD) No.22041 of 2018

¶7

S.VIMAL SEKAR@VIMALA SEKAR ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2

¶8

¶9

STATE REP.THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUNDRAKUDI POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

¶10

(CRIME NO.157/2018) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶11

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed in Crl.O.P(MD).No.22041/2018 dated 1912/2018.

¶12

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.S.KAMESWARAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.K.SUYAMBULINGA BHARATHI,Government Advocate (Crl Side)for the Respondents the court made the following order:-

¶13

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.22041 of 2018 on 19.12.2018.

¶14

The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition imposed by this court in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.22041 of 2018 on 19.12.2018 regularly and he prayed for relaxation of the said condition.

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the

¶17

¶18

petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly and investigation is still pending.

¶19

4.Taking into consideration of the submissions made by both the counsels, the condition imposed by this court in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.22041 of 2018 on 19.12.2018 is modified and the petitioners shall report before the respondent police on every Monday and Friday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

sd/-

18/02/2019

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KARAIKUDI,SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

¶24

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KUNDRAKUDI POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

¶25

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶26

PS/JC/SAR-4/20.02.2019/2P/5C

¶27

ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.1324 of 2019 IN CRL OP(MD) No.22041 of 2018 Date :18/02/2019

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Vimal Sekar@Vimala Sekar v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Vimal Sekar@Vimala Sekar v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Sudalaimani Vs State by

K.Perumal Vs The District Collector

T.Sivakumar, Vs The Commissioner of Police

Govindarasu Vs State Rep.by

V.S.J.Dinakaran Vs the State Rep. by

T.Meena Vs Seeralan