Mohan v. State Rep by
Case brief
What is this about?
In a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the petitioner, arrested after eleven years of absconding for murder-related offences, sought release. The court noted no change in circumstances and denied bail, dismissing the petition.
What did the court decide?
Bail application dismissed; petitioner to remain in judicial custody.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Eleventh day of April Two Thousand Nineteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.1953 of 2019 (On the file of the P.R.C.No.22 of 2010 before the Judicial
Magistrate No.II, at Ponneri )
MOHAN [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, E-5, SHOLAVARAM POLICE STATION, THIRUVALLUR DISTRICT. CRIME NO. 94 OF 2007.
For Petitioner : M/S.S.SHANTHA KUMAR Advocate
For Respondent : M/S M.MOHAMED RIYAZ, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
PETITION FOR BAIL 439 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
The petitioner/A7, who was arrested and remanded judicial custody on 19.11.2018 at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 201 and 302 of IPC in Crime No.94 of 2007 on the file of the respondent police and in P.R.C.No.22 of 2010 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate-II, Ponneri, seeks bail.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner who had absconded for eleven years before being arrested.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MOHAN
- respondent
STATE REP BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, E-5, SHOLAVARAM POLICE STATION, THIRUVALLUR DISTRICT
Coram
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court