The petitioner sought Cr.P.C. 482 permission to quash evidentiary proceedings. It was dismissed when counsel withdrew the petition.
None; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated 22.07.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
Crl.OP.No.18203 of 2019
N.Raghavulu Naidu
.. Petitioner
Vs
The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Central Bureau of Investigation, Anti Corruption Branch, Chennai. .. Respondent
Prayer:- Petition filed under section 482 Cr.P.C., to set aside the order dated 13.03.2019 of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore at Chennai in Crl.M.P.No.913 of 2018 in C.C.No.6282 of 2017 and direct the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore at Chennai not to record the evidences of 27 witnesses namely (L.W.2 DrGopalsamy, L.W.3 Geetha Haripriya, L.W.4 Jamuna Chandraiya L.W.18,19,27,28,29,30,31,32,35,40,42,44, 45,47,48,52,58,59,63,68,69,72,73 & 78) and not to mark the documents in this case namely L.DNo's:3,4,8,9,10,11,12,13,14, 15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,3 6,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57 ,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78, 79,80,81,82,83,84,100,101,103,105,109,111,112,113,114,115,116,11 7,118,119,132,133,134,139,140,141,142,143,153,154,155,156,159,16 0,161,163,165,166,167,168,169,171,172,173,174,& 175 in CC.No.6282 of 2017 and the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore at Chennai may be directed to examine the witnesses of the Registrar of Companies, Chennai pertaining to the charges relevant to this case and not other facts from their 161 Cr.P.C., statements, in the interest of justice, in the interest of case, for arriving fair conclusion in this case and to avoid the 'Double Jeopardy' to the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Sivanantham, Senior Counsel For M/s.K.Sathiyamurthi
For Respondent : Mr.K.Srinivasan, SPP (CBI)
ORDER
The learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS III)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
ssi
To
1.The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate,
Egmore.
2.The Inspector of Police,
Central Bureau of Investigation,
Anti Corruption Branch, Chennai.
3.The Public Prosecutor(CBI Cases),
High Court, Chennai.
Crl.OP.No.18203 of 2019
ssd(co)
nr 16/09/2019
N.Raghavulu Naidu
The State represented by The Inspector of Police, Central Bureau of Investigation, Anti Corruption Branch, Chennai
A.D.Jagadish Chandira
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
