The High Court treated the petition as infructuous because the underlying order dated 2015 was from the previous year, dismissing the request to modify bail conditions regarding deposit and surety.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.06.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
CRL.OP.No. 12888 of 2015
and
M.P.No.1 of 2015
T.Vijaya Prabhu ...Petitioner Vs. S.Srinivasan ...Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, praying to modify the order dated 13.05.2015 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1317 of 2015 in C.A.No.43 of 2015 on the file of the learned Vacation Judge (Criminal Side) at Tiruvallur to the effect that the deposit of Rs.2,25,000/- may be waived and also to the effect that the petitioner is willing to execute one surety for a sum of Rs.25,000/- to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate along with another ordinary surety.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Shivakumar
ORDER
This petition has been filed seeking for modification of the condition imposed by the Court below while allowing the suspension of sentence petition filed by the petitioner.
Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. dh
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
(Criminal Side) at Tiruvallur.
CRL.OP.No. 12888 of 2015
Kak(17/07/2019)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Criminal Original Petition seeking modification of bail conditions filed years after the order became infructuous should be entertained.
T.Vijaya Prabhu
S.Srinivasan
N.Anand Venkatesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
