Allowed

Gopi v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC12 Jun 2019CRL MP(MD)/4958/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition to relax bail conditions imposed in a connected criminal proceeding. Petitioners had been complying regularly without witness tampering complaints. Court ordered relaxation of prior conditions with requirement to report when required.

What did the court decide?

Conditions imposed in Crl.O.P(MD)No.6512 of 2019 dated 30.04.2019 are relaxed; petitioners shall report to the respondent as and when required.

Gopi Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Twelfth day of June Two Thousand Nineteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.RAJAMANICKAM

¶6

CRL MP(MD) No.4958 of 2019 IN CRL OP(MD) No.6512 of 2019

¶7

1.GOPI 2 VELLAIDURAI ... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS

¶8

¶9

STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PULIYANGUDI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶10

(CRIME NO.138/2019) ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶11

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed by this Honourable Court order made in Crl.OP(MD)No.6512 of 2019, dated 30.04.2019 on the file of this Honourable Court.

¶12

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of MR.C.MAYILVAHANA RAJENDRAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mrs.M.ANANTHA DEVI, Government Advocate(Crl. Side) on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶13

This petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioners in Crl.O.P(MD)No.6512 of 2019.

¶14

The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been complying with the condition imposed by this court in Crl.O.P(MD)No.6512 of 2019 on 30.04.2019 regularly, and he prays for relaxation of the said condition.

¶15

The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the petitioners have been complying with the condition regularly.

¶16

Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioners complying with the condition regularly and there is no complaint of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the petitioners tampering with the witnesses, the condition imposed by this court in Crl.O.P(MD)No.6512 of 2019 on 30.04.2019 is

¶17

¶18

relaxed. However, the petitioners shall report before the respondent as and when required for interrogation.

¶19

sd/12/06/2019 / TRUE COPY /

¶20

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶21

¶22

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,SIVAGIRI. 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,TIRUNELVELI.

¶23

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PULIYANGUDI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶24

4 ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.

¶25

+1. C.C. to Mr.C.MAYILVAHANA RAJENDRAN Advocate SR.No.9595

¶26

ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.4958 of 2019 IN CRL OP(MD) No.6512 of 2019 Date :12/06/2019

¶27

das

¶28

AE/JC/SAR-III (17.06.2019) 2P 6C

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Gopi v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gopi v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh, Vs the Inspector of Police

Saravanan, Vs the Inspector of Police

Gnanatheeebam Vs the Inspector of Police

Daisy Nabi Kumar, Vs the Inspector of Police

Vijay, Vs the Inspector of Police

Selvindevadhass, Vs the Inspector of Police