Allowed

Jayaston, S/O.Amirtharaj v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC17 Jun 2019CRL MP(MD)/4832/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought relaxation of bail conditions imposed in a criminal operation. The court noted regular compliance and lack of witness tampering complaints, ordering the relaxation with a requirement to report for interrogation when needed.

What did the court decide?

Relaxation of conditions imposed in Crl. OP(MD) No.6533 of 2019; directed to report as required for interrogation.

Jayaston, S/O.Amirtharaj Vs the Inspector of Police — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

EFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 17/06/2019

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.RAJAMANICKAM CRL MP(MD). No.4832 of 2019 in Crl.O.P(MD) No.6533 of 2019

¶7

Jayaston,

¶8

Danston, ... Petitioners/Petitioners 1 & 3

¶9

¶10

State:

¶11

The Inspector of Police, Tioruchendur Police Station, Thoothukudi District. Cr.No.140 of 2019.

¶12

... Respondent/Complainant

¶13

For Petitioner : M/s.T.A.Ebenezer, Advocate. For Respondent : M.Anantha Devi, Govt.Advocate (Crl.Side).

¶14

PETITION FOR RELAXATION Under Sec.482 Cr.P.C

¶15

PRAYER :-

¶16

To relax the conditions imposed in Crl.OP(MD)No.6533 of 2019 on 30.04.2019.

¶17

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶18

The petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in CRL OP(MD) No.6533 of 2019.

¶19

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition imposed by this https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ court in CRL OP(MD) No.6533 of 2019 on 30/04/2019 regularly, and he prays for relaxation of the said condition.

¶20

¶21

The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly.

¶22

Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is complying with the condition regularly and there is no complaint of the petitioner tampering with the witnesses, the condition imposed by this court in CRL OP(MD) No.6533 of 2019 on 30/04/2019 is relaxed. However, the petitioner shall report before the respondent as and when required for interrogation.

¶23

sd/17/06/2019 / TRUE COPY /

¶24

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶25

¶26

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUCHENDUR.

¶27

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TUTICORIN.

¶28

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TIRUCHENDUR TALUK POLICE STATION, TUTICORIN DISTRICT.

¶29

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶30

ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.4832 of 2019 IN CRL OP(MD) No.6533 of 2019 Date :17/06/2019 aav AE/JC/SAR-II (20.06.2019) 2P 5C

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Jayaston, S/O.Amirtharaj v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jayaston, S/O.Amirtharaj v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Selvamani, Vs the Inspector of Police

P.Muthurasu, Vs the Inspector of Police

Abdul Majith Vs the Inspector of Police

Jemila, Vs the Inspector of Police

S.Raja @ Alagarsamy, Vs the Inspector of Police

Sundararajan Vs the Sub Inspector of Police