Karthikeyan v. the Sub Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Court relaxed the condition of regular police reporting imposed on petitioners in a criminal order, accepting their compliance and absence of tampering complaints.
What did the court decide?
Condition of regular reporting was relaxed. Petitioners to report as required for interrogation.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Tenth day of June Two Thousand Nineteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.RAJAMANICKAM
CRL MP(MD) No.4779 of 2019 IN CRL OP(MD) No.6047 of 2019
1 KARTHIKEYAN 2 VASU
3 BALUSAMY 4 MALAIKANNAN ... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS
THE STATE REP.BY, THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KEELATHOOVAL POLICE STATION, RAMNAD DISTRICT, CRIME NO. 28 OF 2019 ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to Relax the condition imposed in CRl.O.P (MD) No. 6047 of 2019 dated 26.04.2019 on the file of this Honourable Court.
Order :This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.A.UTHAYAKUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner and of MRS.M.ANANTHADEVI, Government Advocate on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Karthikeyan and Others
- respondent
The State Rep. by the Sub Inspector of Police Keelathoval
Coram
P. RAJAMANICKAM
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court