Partly allowed

Ramesh, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC7 Jun 2019CRL MP(MD)/4768/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A criminal miscellaneous petition seek relaxation of bail conditions imposed in a related order. Observing the petitioner's regular compliance and lack of witness tampering, the court relaxed the conditions but maintained a requirement to report for interrogation as needed.

What did the court decide?

The condition imposed in Crl.O.P(MD)No.5811 of 2019 dated 23.04.2019 is relaxed subject to the petitioner reporting before the respondent as and when required for interrogation.

Ramesh, Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the Seventh day of June Two Thousand Nineteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.RAJAMANICKAM

¶6

CRL MP(MD) No.4768 of 2019 IN CRL OP(MD) No.5811 of 2019

¶7

RAMESH ... PETITIONER/ PETITIONER

¶8

¶9

THE STATE REP BY

¶10

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THANJAVUR TALUK POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT.

¶11

CR.NO.134/2019 ... RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT

¶12

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed by this Honourable Court in Crl.O.P (MD).No.5811/2019 dated 23/04/2019.

¶13

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.K.M.KARUNAKARAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mrs.M.ANANTHA DEVI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶14

This petition has been filed to relax, the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P(MD)No.5811 of 2019 on 23.04.2019.

¶15

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P(MD)No.5811 of 2019 on 23.04.2019 regularly, and he prays for relaxation of the said condition.

¶16

3.The learned Government (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner has been complying with the condition regularly.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is complying with the condition regularly and there is no complaint of the petitioner tampering with the witnesses, the condition imposed

¶18

¶19

by this Court in Crl.O.P(MD)No.5811 of 2019 on 23.04.2019 is relaxed. However, the petitioner shall report before the respondent as and when required for interrogation.

¶20

sd/07/06/2019 / TRUE COPY /

¶21

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO II, THANJAVUR DISTRICT. 2.THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJAVUR DISTRICT AT KUMBAKONAM. 3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THANJAVUR TALUK POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT. 4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. C.C. to Mr.K.M.KARUNAKARAN Advocate SR.No.9294 ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.4768 of 2019 IN CRL OP(MD) No.5811 of 2019 Date :07/06/2019 dss TK/MMS/SAR.3/13.06.2019/2P/6C

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Ramesh, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesh, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mani, Vs the Inspector of Police

Eswari, Vs the Inspector of Police

S.Michael Raj, Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Gnanasundari Vs the Inspector of Police

M.Krishnamoorthy, Vs the Inspector of Police

Pandiyarajan, Vs the Inspector of Police