Allowed

Pandiyarajan, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC7 Jun 2019CRL MP(MD)/4732/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court relaxed an order imposing bail conditions on two accused petitioners. The court noted their regular compliance and absence of witness tampering complaints. The petitioners were directed to report as required for interrogation.

What did the court decide?

Condition imposed in Crl.O.P(MD)No.6840 of 2019 on 08.05.2019 is relaxed; petitioners must report as required for interrogation.

Pandiyarajan, Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the Seventh day of June Two Thousand Nineteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.RAJAMANICKAM

¶6

CRL MP(MD) No.4732 of 2019 IN CRL OP(MD) No.6840 of 2019

¶7

1 PANDIYARAJAN ... PETITIONER/PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.1 2 MUTHURAKKU ... PETITIONER/PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.4

¶8

¶9

STATE REPRESENTED BY

¶10

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AAVIYUR POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT

¶11

Crime No.84/2019 ... RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶12

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner vide order dated 08.05.2019 by this Honourable Court in Crl.OP(MD)No.6840 of 2019.

¶13

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.J.VIJAYARAJA, Advocate for the petitioners and of Mrs.M.ANANTHA DEVI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶14

This petition has been filed to relax, the condition imposed on the petitioners in Crl.O.P(MD)No.6840 of 2019 on 08.05.2019.

¶15

2.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been complying with the condition imposed by this Court in Crl.O.P(MD)No.6840 of 2019 on 08.05.2019 regularly, and he prays for relaxation of the said condition.

¶16

3.The learned Government (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioners have been complying with the condition regularly.

¶17

4.Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioners are https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ complying with the condition regularly and there is no complaint of the petitioners tampering with the witnesses, the condition imposed

¶18

¶19

by this Court in Crl.O.P(MD)No.6840 of 2019 on 08.05.2019 is relaxed. However, the petitioners shall report before the respondent as and when required for interrogation.

¶20

sd/07/06/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO II, VIRUDHUNAGAR. 2.THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR. 3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AAVIYUR POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. 4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. C.C. to Mr.J.VIJAYARAJA Advocate SR.No.9384 ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.4732 of 2019 IN CRL OP(MD) No.6840 of 2019 Date :07/06/2019 dss TK/MMS/SAR.3/13.06.2019/2P/6C

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Pandiyarajan, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pandiyarajan, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mani, Vs the Inspector of Police

Eswari, Vs the Inspector of Police

S.Michael Raj, Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Gnanasundari Vs the Inspector of Police

Ramesh, Vs the Inspector of Police

M.Krishnamoorthy, Vs the Inspector of Police