Allowed

S.Suthakar, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC15 May 2019CRL MP(MD)/4661/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench extended the time limit for the petitioner to execute sureties and surrender before the Magistrate Court. The anticipatory bail granted earlier stands automated vacated if the petitioner fails to comply within the extended period of two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Time to produce sureties extended for two weeks from the date of receipt of this order; non-compliance will vacate anticipatory bail.

S.Suthakar, Vs the Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Fifteenth day of May Two Thousand Nineteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

S.SUTHAKAR ... PETITIONER/ PETITIONER

¶7

¶8

STATE REP. BY

¶9

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SATTUR TOWN POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

¶10

(CRIME NO.23/2019) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT

¶11

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to grant extension the time of the operation of the order in Crl OP (MD)No.1724 of 2019 dated 15.04.2019 on the file of this Honourable Court.

¶12

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of MR.M.JEGADEESHPANDIAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶13

This petition has been filed to extend the time limit of the petitioner to execute the sureties and surrender before the concerned Magistrate Court.

¶14

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to produce sureties. Since there was a difficulty in arranging the sureties, the petitioner is unable to execute the sureties within the stipulated time as per the order of Crl.O.P(MD) No.1724 of 2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ dated 15.04.2019.

¶15

¶16

3.In view of the same, time granted by this Court in Crl.O.P (MD) No.1724 of 2019 dated 15.04.2019 is extended further for a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, failing which the anticipatory bail already granted by this Court shall stand vacated automatically.

sd/-

15/05/2019

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶21

¶22

1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, SATTUR. 2.DO THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. 3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SATTUR TOWN POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

¶23

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1 CC to M/s.M.JEGADEESH PANDIAN, Advocate ( SR-8572[I] dated 16/05/2019 )

¶24

ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.4661 of 2019 IN CRL OP(MD) No.1724 of 2019 Date :15/05/2019 JM/VR/SAR 2/17.05.2019/2P/6C

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Suthakar, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Suthakar, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Pitchaimari Vs the Inspector of Police

S. Mariammal, Vs the Inspector of Police

Kadappan Vs State Reb.by

Jeyaraman, Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Praveen Vs the Inspector of Police

A.Ramasamy Vs Inspector of Police