R.Pitchaimari v. the Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
A bail petition was dismissed as withdrawn. The court did not grant bail as the petitioner withdrew the application procedurally.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Ninth day of May Two Thousand Nineteen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI
CRL OP(MD) No.6853 of 2019
R.PITCHAIMARI ... PETITIONER /SOLE ACCUSED
STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, RAJAPALAYAM TALUK, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. (UNDER CRIME NO.7/2019) ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : Mr.G.R.SATISH, Advocate
For Respondent : Mr.S.CHANDRASEKAR, Additional Public Prosecutor
PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
2
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.6853 of 2019 Date :09/05/2019
MS/PN/SAR-2/14.05.2019/2P.4C
R.PITCHAIMARI
STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, RAJAPALAYAM TALUK, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.
M.DHANDAPANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court