Mohan v. the State Represented by
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court cancelled an order suspending sentence granted earlier. The imperative order, recorded that the three appellants failed to appear before the trial court and were in deliberate disobedience of the suspended terms.
What did the court decide?
Suspension order of 25.10.2019 cancelled; accused directed to be committed to prison.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Twentieth day of January Two Thousand Twenty One
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.VELMURUGAN
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.13689 of 2019
IN CRL.A.No.643 of 2019
1 MOHAN [ APPELLANT / ACCUSED NO.1 TO 3 ]
2 MUKUNTHAN
3 CHINNATHAMBI
Vs
THE STATE REPRESENTED BY [ RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PONNERI POLICE STATION, PONNERI, THIRUVALLUR DISTRICT. (*)CR.NO.209/2013
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the Memorandum of Grounds in Crl.A.No.643/2019 on the file of the High Court, the High Court will be pleased to suspend the conviction and sentence passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge in S.C.No.293/2014 dated 11.03.2019, pending disposal of the above Crl.A.No.643/2019.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suspension of sentence granted earlier should be cancelled due to non-compliance by the accused.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
MOHAN
- appellant
MUKUNTHAN
- appellant
CHINNATHAMBI
- respondent
STATE
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court