Ranjith Kumar v. State Rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Appeal filed to set aside impugned order and enlarge bail was dismissed as withdrawn by the appellant without substantive hearing or reason.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.10.2019
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA
Crl.A.No. 578 of 2019
Ranjith Kumar ... Appellant/Petitioner/Accused No.2
Vs.
1. State rep.by
Inspector of Police,
Virudampet Police Station,
Vellore District. ...Respondent/Respondent/Complainant
(Cirme No.373 of 2019)
2.Karthi ... Respondent/Respondent/
Defacto Complainant
Criminal Appeal filed under Section 14 (A)(2) of SC/ST Act, 1989 to set aside the order passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Vellore, Vellore District in Crl.M.P.No.3749 of 2019 dated 30.07.2019 and enlarge the appellant on bail in Crime No.373 of 2019 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Viruthampet, Vellore District.
For Appellant : Mr.G.Vinodh Kumar
For Respondents: Mr.M.Mohamed Riyaz
Additional Public Prosecutor [for R1] No Appearance [for R2] J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ranjith Kumar
- respondent
State represented by Inspector of Police Virudampet Police Station
- respondent
Karthi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court