This court disposed of a contempt petition filed against respondents for alleged disobedience of an order granting grade pay revision and pension benefits. The court found the order was complied with and closed the petition.
Contempt Petition closed as nothing survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONT.P.(MD)No.971 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.12.2019 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN CONT.P.(MD)No.971 of 2019
Y.Shahul Hameed
: Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs
1.J.Radhakrishnan,
Principal Secretary to Government, Transport Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.
2.Baskar, Managing Director, State Express Transport Corporation Ltd., (SETC), Pallavan Salai, Chennai.
3.Ponmudi, General Manager, State Express Transport Corporation Ltd., (SETC), Pallavan Salai, Chennai.
4.Venkatraj, Administrator (In charge), Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust, Thiruvalluvar House, Pallavan Salai, Chennai-600 002.
:Contemnors/ Respondents
(1st Respondent was deleted vide high Court order dated 13.12.2019)
PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the contemnors / respondents in accordance with law for their willful disobedience of the order in W.P.(MD)No.993 of 2019 dated 21.01.2019.
Prayer in WP(MD). 993/ 2019 :
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to revise the petitioners Grade Pay in the month of October, 2013 based on the G.O.No.61 Transport dated 30.4.2015 and further directing the respondents to pay the petitioner the difference amount in his salary for the month of October, 2013 and to pay difference amount in his retirement benefits including monthly pension, gratuity, leave salary, dearness
1/2
CONT.P.(MD)No.971 of 2019
allowance, commuted value of pension and all other attendant benefits payable to him together within a reasonable rate of interest.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Sudhagar Nagaraj For R2 and R3 : Mr.K.Sathyasingh For R4 : Mr.A.Swaminathan
ORDER
This contempt petition has been filed complaining disobedience of the order of this Court made in W.P.(MD)No.993 of 2019 dated 21.01.2019.
Assistant Registrar ()
// True Copy //
/ /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
ta
+1 CC to Mr.K.SATHIYA SINGH, Advocate(SR-106214[F]dated 20/12/2019 )
+1 CC to Mr.A.SWAMINATHAN, Advocate ( SR-106242[F]dated 20/12/2019 )
CONT.P.(MD)No.971 of 2019 20.12.2019
VB(21.01.2020) 2P 3C
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents have willfully disobeyed this Court's order dated 21.01.2019 directing revision of grade pay and payment of difference.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Y.Shahul Hameed
J.Radhakrishnan
Baskar
Ponmudi
Venkatraj
R.SUBRAMANIAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
