Disposed

Chinnammal v. Balachandran

Madras HC15 Oct 2019CONT P(MD)/1150/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court dismissed a contempt petition filed for wilful disobedience of a previous ruling regarding retirement benefits. The respondent counsel submitted that the original order was complied with by 30.09.2019, leading to the closure of the contempt application.

What did the court decide?

The contempt petition was closed based on the respondent's submission that the prior order was complied with.

Chinnammal Vs Balachandran — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

CONT.P.(MD)No.1150/2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 15.10.2019

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI

¶6

CONT.P.(MD)No.1150 of 2019

¶7

Chinnammal

¶8

... Petitioner/Petitioner

¶9

-Vs-

¶10

Balachandran The Commissioner Dindigul Municipal Corporation Trichy Road, Dindigul Town Dindigul District ...Contemnor/ Respondent

¶11

Prayer: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the contemnor/respondent for wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court, dated 24.04.2019 passed in writ petition in W.P(MD).No.9765 of 2019.

¶12

Prayer in WP(MD). 9765/ 2019 :

¶13

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider and take appropriate action on the representation of the petitioner dated 08.04.2019 for the disbursement of the retirement monetary benefits with 18% interest from the date of retirement i.e. on 30.04.2018 within a stipulated time as that may be fixed by this Honourable Court

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Saravanan For Respondent : Mr.J.Lawrence

¶15

ORDER

¶16

The learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that the order passed in W.P(MD).No.9765 of 2019, has been complied with and he has produced the copy of the proceedings in Na.Ka.No.3938/2019/B3, dated 30.09.2019.

¶17

2.Recording the abovesaid submission and the proceedings dated 30.09.2019, this Contempt Petition stands closed.

¶18

Assistant Registrar(CS-I)

¶19

// True Copy //

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶22

1/2

¶23

CONT.P.(MD)No.1150/2019

¶24

msa

¶25

¶26

Mr.Balachandran The Commissioner Dindigul Municipal Corporation Trichy Road, Dindigul Town Dindigul District

¶27

+1CC TO MR.J.LAWRANCE, Advocate Sr. No. 92058

¶28

CONT.P.(MD)No.1150 of 2019 15.10.2019

¶29

KM(CO) TR(30.10.2019) 2P 3C

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶31

2/2

Chinnammal v. Balachandran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chinnammal v. Balachandran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Ganesan Alias Jabcob Vs K.Manivasan I.A.S.

K.Palanimalai, Vs The Joint Director of Collegiate Education

C.Krishnan Vs the Joint Directorate of Collegiate Education

Adi-Dravidar Primary School, Vs the Government of Tamilnadu

A.Devaraj Vs Atulya Misra

L.Subbiah Vs Atulya Misra