Disposed

A.Ganesan Alias Jabcob v. K.Manivasan I.A.S.

Madras HC14 Oct 2019CONT P(MD)/1217/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act for disobedience of an order regarding pension revision, the respondent Special Government Pleader submitted that the earlier order was complied with, resulting in the closure of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Closed the contempt petition upon satisfaction that the impugned order was complied with.

A.Ganesan Alias Jabcob Vs K.Manivasan I.A.S. — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

CONT.P[MD]No.1217 of 2019

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 14.10.2019

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI

¶6

CONT.P[MD]No.1217 of 2019 in W.P.[MD]No.5832 of 2019

¶7

A.Ganesan @ Jacob ... Petitioner/Petitioner Vs.

¶8

1.K.Manivasan, IAS,

¶9

The Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, Fort St. George,

¶10

Chennai – 600 009.

¶11

2.D.Jaisankar, IAS, Accountant General, (Accountants & Entitlements), Tamil Nadu, No.361, Annasalai, Teynampet, Chennai – 600 018. ...Contemnors/ Respondents 5 and 3

¶12

PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, praying to punish the contemnors / respondents for wanton and willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.[MD[No.5832 of 2019 dated 20.03.2019.

¶13

Prayer in WP(MD). 5832/ 2019 :

¶14

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to revise and re-fix the Petitioner's scale notionally as Rs.9,300-34,800+4,200 with effect from 01.08.10 and pay the arrears together with interest of 9% per annum and pay the revised pension regularly without any delay within the stipulated time fixed by this Honble Court.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Selvanayagam For Respondent No.1 : Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan, Special Government Pleader For Respondent No.2 : Mr.P.Gunasekaran Standing Counsel

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

1/2

¶18

CONT.P[MD]No.1217 of 2019

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

***************

¶21

Mr.VR.Shanmuganathan, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent produced the proceedings of the first respondent dated 14.10.2019 and submitted that the order of this Court has been complied with.

¶22

2.Recording the same, this Contempt Petition is closed. However, it is open to the petitioner to challenge the order, if he is aggrieved.

¶23

Assistant Registrar (AD II)

¶24

// True Copy //

¶25

Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶26

MR To

¶27

1.K.Manivasan, IAS,

¶28

The Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶29

2.D.Jaisankar, IAS, Accountant General, (Accountants & Entitlements), Tamil Nadu, No.361, Annasalai, Teynampet, Chennai – 600 018.

¶30

+1 CC to M/s.D.SELVANAYAGAM, Advocate ( SR-91860[F] dated 15/10/2019 )

¶31

+1 CC to M/s.GP ( SR-91904[F] dated 15/10/2019 )

¶32

+1 CC to M/s.P.GUNASEKARAN, Advocate ( SR-92224[F] dated 16/10/2019 )

¶33

CONT.P[MD]No.1217 of 2019 14.10.2019

¶34

KK/SAR/25.10.2019/2P-6C/

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶36

2/2

A.Ganesan Alias Jabcob v. K.Manivasan I.A.S.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Ganesan Alias Jabcob v. K.Manivasan I.A.S.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijayarani Sugirthabai Vs the Financial Consultant

A.Johnson Irudhayaraj Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

M.Maruthachalam Vs The Director

K.Palanimalai, Vs The Joint Director of Collegiate Education

C.Krishnan Vs the Joint Directorate of Collegiate Education

J.Bhaskaran Vs the State of Tamilnadu