Kuppusamy v. Mr.v.Anbuselvan I.A.S
Case brief
What is this about?
This single-line order permitted the petitioner to challenge a Tahsildar's order in court. It did not proceed to punish the respondents for alleged contempt of a prior court order.
What did the court decide?
Petition closed with liberty to challenge the respondents' order in the manner known to law.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.08.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
Contempt Petition No.797 of 2019
Kuppusamy .. Petitioner
Vs
1.Mr.V.Anbuselvan, I.A.S.,
The District Collector,
Cuddalore.
2.Mr.Mahajan, I.A.S.,
The Revenue Divisional Officer,
Chidambaram,
Cuddalore District.
3.Mr.Kannan,
The Tahsildar,
Kattumannar Koil,
Cuddalore District.
4.Arul Prakasam,
The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar,
Kattumannar Koil,
Cuddalore District.
.. Respondents
PRAYER : Petition filed under section 11 of the Contempt of
Courts Act, to punish the respondent for Contempt of Court
for the wilful disobedience and violation of the order
dated 30.01.2017 passed in W.P.No.2041 of 2017.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Murali
For Respondents : Mr.D.Suriyanarayanan Additional Government Pleader
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kuppusamy
- respondent
Mr. V. Anbuselvan
- respondent
Mr. Mahajan
- respondent
Mr. Kannan
- respondent
Arul Prakasam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court