The High Court dismissed W.P.No.37711 of 2007 as withdrawn upon the petitioner's counsel obtaining the court's permission to withdraw the petition, closing the connected miscellaneous petition as well.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 06.08.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
W.P.No.37711 of 2007 and M.P.No.2 of 2007
Prodex Technologies, Represented by Power of Attorney, Sri K.Mohan Shenoy, No.5, Luz Avenue, 3rd Street, Mylapore, Chennai – 600 004. ..Petitioner Vs 1.Union of India through Ministry of Communications & IT Department of Telecommunications, Rep.by its Under Secretary (CS-1), 12th Floor, Sanchar Bhawan, New Delhi – 110 001. 2.The Deputy Director General, Chennai Circle, VTM Cell, Department of Telecommunications, Ministry of Communications & IT, 3rd Floor, Kellys Telephone Exchange, 22, Kellys Road, Chennai – 600 010. .. Respondents
(2nd respondent amended as per order of this Court dated 21.10.2008 in MP.No.4 of 2008 in W.P.No.37711/2008)
Payer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the respondents herein and to quash the impugned notification No.114/2006-OSP dated 22.2.2007 issued by the 1st respondent and the subsequent Revised Terms and Conditions issued in Ref.No.101074/2005 dated 31.5.2007 and the guidelines issued in Office Memorandum No.18-7/2007-OSP dated 23.8.2007 by the 1st respondent herein, insofar as the petitioner-firm is concerned and direct the second respondent to register the petitioner – firm with the Department of Tele Communications without insisting registration as a company for availing other service provider facility.
(Prayer amended as per order of this Court dated 22.1.2008 in M.P.Nos.1 to 3 of 2008 in W.P.No.37711 of 2007)
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Balasubramanian
For Respondents : Mr.C.V.Ramachandramurthy
CGSC
O R D E R
The learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of
this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an
endorsement to that effect.
2. In view of the above submission and endorsement made by
the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is
dismissed as withdrawn. No Costs. Consequently, connected
miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VIII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
ms
To
1.Union of India through
Ministry of Communications & IT Department of
Telecommunications, Rep.by its
Under Secretary (CS-1),
12 th Floor, Sanchar Bhawan,
New Delhi – 110 001.
2.The Deputy Director General, Chennai Circle, VTM Cell, Department of Telecommunications, Ministry of Communications & IT,
W.P.No.37711 of 2007
and
M.P.No.2 of 2007
ssd[co]
srg 17/09/2019
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Prodex Technologies
Union of India through Ministry of Communications & IT Department of Telecommunications
K.Kalyanasundaram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
