Ramanathan Theru Usman Road v. Mr. D. Karthikeyan, I.A.S.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought punishment for alleged non-compliance of a 2017 order regarding hawker vending places. Court found respondents satisfied with compliance; directed Vendor Committee to identify places. Contempt petition closed without punishment.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed; no punishment imposed on respondents.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 15.02.2019 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN
Contempt Petition No. 705 of 2018
Ramanathan Theru Usman Road Kizhaku Paguthi Small Viyaparigal Sangam Rep.by its Secretary, Reg.No.175/2007 New No.75, M.S. Complex, Ranganathan Street, T.Nagar, Chennai – 600 017 ...Petitioner Vs. 1.D.Karthikeyan,I.A.S. Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Ripon Building, Chennai – 600 003 2.S.Natarajan Zonal Officer – Zone X, Greater Chennai Corporation, No.64,N.S.K.Salai, Kodambakkam, Chennai – 600 024
...Respondents
Prayer: Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents for disobeying the order passed in W.P.No.7333 of 2017 dated 28.03.2017.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Shanmugam For Respondents : Mr.K.Soundararajan
2
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ramanathan Theru Usman Road Kizhaku Paguthi Small Viyaparigal Sangam Rep.by its Secretary
- respondent
D.Karthikeyan, I.A.S. Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai
- respondent
S.Natarajan Zonal Officer – Zone X, Greater Chennai Corporation
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court