M.Sukumar, v. Ms.Sabitha, Ias.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged disobedience of a 2016 order. Court accepted respondent's submission that compassion appointment was provided. Contempt petition closed.
What did the court decide?
Contempt Petition closed without award of punishment upon establishment of compliance via compassionate appointment.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.07.2019
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA
Contempt Petition No.2365 of 2016
M.Sukumar ... Petitioner
Vs.
1. Ms.Sabitha, I.A.S.,
Secretary,
Government of Tamil Nadu,
School Education Department,
Secretariat, Chennai-9.
2. Thiru S.Kannappan,
Director of School Education,
Chennai-600 006.
3. Thiru Arulazhagan,
District Educational Officer,
Namakkal, Namakkal District. ... Respondents
This Contempt Petition is filed to punish the
respondents for willfully and wantonly disobeying the order of this Court dated 28.04.2016 in W.P.No.12121/2016.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ganesan for M/s.C.S.Associates
For Respondents : Mrs.P.Kavitha, Govt. Advocate
O R D E R
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.Sukumar
- respondent
Ms.Sabitha, I.A.S.
- respondent
Thiru S.Kannappan
- respondent
Thiru Arulazhagan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court