This common order closes four contempt petitions filed against Railway Protection Force officials for alleged non-compliance of a 2018 judgment, as writ appeals with interim stays were subsequently filed.
Contempt petitions and connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED:21.02.2019
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.PARTHIBAN
Cont.P.Nos.1786, 1787, 1788 and 1789 of 2018
and
Sub.A.Nos.8, 9, 10 and 11 of 2019
1.T.Ganesan
2.T.Dharmaraj
3.G.Saravanan
4.B.A.Balu
5.V.P.Paneer Selvam
6.A.Sekaran
7.C.Gandhi
8.S.Arone
9.N.Gabrial
10.L.Venkatesalu ... Petitioners in
Cont.P.No.1786 of 2018
1.M.Velayutham
2.M.Pakirisamy
3.M.P.Kuppusamy
4.A.K.Sukumar
5.K.Murugan
6.A.K.Srinivasan ... Petitioners in
Cont.P.No.1787 of 2018
1.R.Dinakaran,
2.C.Anbazhagan .... Petitioners in
Cont.P.No.1788 of 2018
1.L.Natarajan
2.M.Devendiran
3.T.Harikrishnan ... Petitioners in
Cont.P.No.1789 of 2018
vs. 1.Mr.Dharmendar Kumar,IPS, The Director General, Railway Protection Force, Railway Board, New Delhi.
2
2.Mr.Birendra Kumar,
The Chief Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Force, Southern Railway, Park Town, Chennai-600 003
... Respondents in all the Cont.Petitions
Petitions filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of
Courts Act to punish the respondents for the wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.Nos.27829 of 2010, 27828 of 2010, 27831 of 2010 and W.P.No.27830 of 2010, dated 14.02.2018.
For Petitioners .. Mr.N.R.Arun Natarajan For Respondents .. Mr.Vijay Anand
COMMON ORDER
Alleging that the common order of this Court, dated
14.02.2018, made in W.P.Nos.27829 of 2010, 27828 of 2010, 27831 of 2010 and W.P.No.27830 of 2010, has not been complied with by the respondents, the petitioners have come up with these contempt petitions.
2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned
Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents/contemnors submits that as against the order passed in W.P.Nos.27829 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ of 2010, 27828 of 2010, 27831 of 2010 and W.P.No.27830 of
2010, dated 14.02.2018, writ appeals in W.A.Nos.2191 to
3
2195 of 2018 have been filed, in which, interim stay has also been granted. He has also produced a copy of the order, dated 04.02.2019, passed by the Division Bench of this Court in the above said Writ Appeals.
3.In view of the above submission, nothing survives
for consideration in the contempt petitions. Accordingly,
the contempt petitions are closed. Connected miscellaneous
petitions are also closed.
SD/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES)
msk
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2019.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
from 25 th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing
Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this
format.
PS/14/03/2019
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petitions maintainability in light of pending writ appeals and interim stay.
T.Ganesan
T.Dharmaraj
G.Saravanan
B.A.Balu
V.P.Paneer Selvam
Dharmendar Kumar
V.Parthiban
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
