Dismissed

Sumana Suresh v. R.Seethalakshmi I.A.S

Madras HC20 Dec 2019CONT P/1332/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this contempt petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, S. Sumana Suresh challenged non-compliance with a dated 27.06.2017 order. The Court found that the order was complied with via a rejection notice dated 26.11.2019, leading to dismissal of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Contempt petition was dismissed as the earlier Court order was complied with by passing a rejection order on 26.11.2019.

Sumana Suresh Vs R.Seethalakshmi I.A.S — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

Cont. P. 1332 of 2019

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 20.12.2019

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN

¶6

Cont. P. 1332 of 2019
in
W.P. 16025 of 2017
S. Sumana Suresh ... Petitioner
Versus
1. Tmt. R.Seethalakshmi, I.A.S.,
The District Collector,
Chennai District,
Chennai-600 002.
2. Thiru Dharmendra Pratap Yadav, I.A.S.,
Chairman,
The Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board,
No.5, Kamarajar Salai,
Triplicane, Chennai-600 005. ... Respondents

¶7

PRAYER : Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Court Act, praying to punish the respondents for their willful disobedience of the order of this Hon'ble Court dated 27.06.2017 made in W.P. No.16025

¶8

of 2017 on the file of this Hon'ble Court.

¶9

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶10

1/3

¶11

Cont. P. 1332 of 2019

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Mathivanan

¶13

For Respondents : Mr.R.Govindasamy, Special Govt. Pleader for R1

¶14

Mr.R.Sivakumar, Standing Counsel for R2

¶15

O R D E R Earlier, this Court by an order dated 27.06.2017 directed the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 25.09.2016 and pass orders in accordance with law. Since the order has not been complied with, the present Contempt Petition has been filed.

¶16

Today, when the matter taken up for hearing, Mr.R.Govindasamy, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the 1^st respondent submitted that, now the District Collector had passed the order dated 26.11.2019 rejecting the petitioner's representation. He has also produced the copy of the order.

¶17

Considering the fact that, the order passed by this Court in W.P.

¶18

16025 of 2017 has been complied with, no further adjudication is required. Accordingly, the Contempt Petition stands dismissed. However, if the

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

2/3

¶21

Cont. P. 1332 of 2019

¶22

petitioner is having any grievance over the order passed by the 1^st respondent, he can very well challenge the same in the manner known to law.

¶23

SD/-

¶24

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES)
rpp
//Certified to be true copy//
Dated at Madras this the day of 2020.
COURT OFFICER(O.S.)
from 25 th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of
the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.
SMI/10.03.2020
To
1. The District Collector,
Chennai District,
Chennai-600 002.
2. Chairman,
The Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board,
No.5, Kamarajar Salai,
Triplicane, Chennai-600 005.

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶26

3/3

Sumana Suresh v. R.Seethalakshmi I.A.S

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sumana Suresh v. R.Seethalakshmi I.A.S

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandrasekar Vs Arunagiri

Maharaja Lining Industries Vs State Bank of India

Ranjan Vs Kaladevi

Sri-La-Sri Sathya Gnana Vs the Commissioner

Kumari Vs K.Narayanan

Global United Shipping India Vs Traffic Manager