Partly allowed

Poornam v. the Branch Manager

Madras HC5 Jul 2019CMP(MD)/5657/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single-judge civil revision bench condoned a 710-day delay in filing a civil revision petition for setting aside a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal order, subject to payment of Rs. 500 costs to the Legal Aid Service Authority.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 710 days in representing the Civil Revision Petition is condoned subject to payment of Rs. 500 to the Legal Aid Service Authority.

Poornam Vs the Branch Manager — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the Fifth day of July Two Thousand Nineteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU

¶6

CMP(MD) No.5657 of 2019 IN CRP(MD) No.SR22353 of 2017

¶7

POORNAM ... PETITIONER/ PETITIONER

¶8

Vs
1 THE BRANCH MANAGER,
THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
DOOR NO.2A, NORTH STREEY,
THALLAKULAM, MADURAI-625 002.
2 THE BRANCH MANAGER,
THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
DIVISIONAL OFFICE,
DOOR NO.108, T.P.K. ROAD,
MADURAI-625 001.
3 ANNARAJAMMAL
4 PRABHU
5 MADHAN
6 BOOPALAN ... RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS

¶9

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to pass an order condoning the delay of 710 days in representing the civil revision petition in C.R.P.(MD)SR.No.22353 of 2017.

¶10

PRAYER IN CRP(MD) No.SR22353 of 2017:

¶11

To pass an order setting aside the fair and executable order dated 05.11.2014 passed in the application to condone delay in I.A.No.234 of 2009 in M.C.O.P.No.68 of 2005 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal cum Subordinate Court, Ramanathapuram.

¶12

ORDER : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.T.R.JEYAPALAM, Advocate for the petitioner, the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ court made the following order:-

¶13

¶14

This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to condone the delay of 710 days in representing the above Civil Revision Petition.

¶15

2.Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition and also considering the length of delay, this Court is inclined to condone the delay subject to the payment of cost of Rs.500/- (Rupees five hundred only) to the Legal Aid Service Authority, attached to this Bench, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of copy of this order, failing which this petition shall stand dismissed automatically without any further reference to this Court.

¶16

3.This petition is accordingly ordered.

¶17

In the event of payment of cost, the Registry is directed to number the revision, if it is otherwise in order and list the same “for admission” forthwith. sd/05/07/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO THE MOTOR ACCIDENTS CLAIMS TRIBUNAL CUM SUBORDINATE JUDGE, RAMANATHAPURAM. COPY TO: 1 THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, LEGAL AID SERVICES AUTHORITY, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. 2 THE SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, AE SECTION, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ JM/VR/SAR 1/18.07.2019/2P/4C

Poornam v. the Branch Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Poornam v. the Branch Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Managing Director Vs Ponnammal

A.Santhanamary Vs G.Subramani

Mariamma, (Died), Yesudhas , Vs Madhavan (Died)

D.Jeyalakshmi, W/O.Late.R.M.T. Vs R.M.T.S.S.Suryakumar

Arumugapandi, S/O.Perumalnadar Vs Issakiammal

Kaliammal Vs Subramanian, 91, Doovipuram