Allowed

Arumugapandi, S/O.Perumalnadar v. Issakiammal

Madras HC5 Jul 2019CMP(MD)/5562/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought condonation of a 111-day delay in filing a Civil Revision Petition and Consent Memorandum. The court inclined to condone the delay subject to the payment of Rs.500/- to the Legal Aid Service Authority within one week.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of 111-day delay for representing CRP(MD) SR.7429 and CMP(MD) SR.7431 deposited in the Legal Aid Service Authority.

Arumugapandi, S/O.Perumalnadar Vs Issakiammal — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the Fifth day of July Two Thousand Nineteen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU

¶6

CMP(MD) No.5562 of 2019 IN CRP(MD) No.SR7429 of 2019

¶7

ARUMUGAPANDI ... PETITIONER/PETITIONER/PETITIONER

1 ISSAKIAMMAL

2 MUTHULAKSHMI

3 UMAYA PARVATHI ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶12

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to condone the delay of 111 days in representing the CRP(MD) SR.No.7429 of 2019 and CMP(MD)SR.No.7431 of 2019 on the file of this Honourable Court.

¶13

PRAYER in CRP(MD)SR.No.7429 of 2019:

¶14

To allow the civil revision petition and set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 30.11.2018 made in I.A.No.431 of 2018 in O.S.No.12 of 2017 on the file of District Munsif Court, Tiruchendur.

¶15

PRAYER in CMP(MD)SR.No.7431 of 2019:

¶16

To Ad-Interim Stay of all further proceedings in O.S.No.12 of 2017 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Tiruchendur, pending disposal of the Civil Revision Petition.

¶17

ORDER :This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.A.ARUMUGAM, Advocate for the petitioner, the court made the following order:-

¶18

This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to condone the delay of 111 days in representing the above Civil Revision Petition.

¶19

2.Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition and also considering the length of delay, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ this Court is inclined to condone the delay subject to the payment of cost of Rs.500/- (Rupees five hundred only) to the Legal Aid Service Authority, attached to this Bench, within a period of one

¶20

¶21

week from the date of receipt of copy of this order, failing which this petition shall stand dismissed automatically without any further reference to this Court.

¶22

3.This petition is accordingly ordered.

¶23

In the event of payment of cost, the Registry is directed to number the revision, if it is otherwise in order and list the same “for admission” forthwith.

¶24

sd/05/07/2019 / TRUE COPY /

¶25

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶26

¶27

THE DISTRICT MUNSIF, TIRUCHENDUR

¶28

COPY TO : THE OFFICER INCHARGE, LEGAL AID SERVICE AUTHOITY, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶29

COPY TO : THE SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, AE SECTION, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶30

msa

¶31

PK/VR/SAR-3/12.07.2019 : 2P/4C

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Arumugapandi, S/O.Perumalnadar v. Issakiammal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arumugapandi, S/O.Perumalnadar v. Issakiammal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Managing Director Vs Ponnammal

A.Santhanamary Vs G.Subramani

Mariamma, (Died), Yesudhas , Vs Madhavan (Died)

D.Jeyalakshmi, W/O.Late.R.M.T. Vs R.M.T.S.S.Suryakumar

Kaliammal Vs Subramanian, 91, Doovipuram

Poornam Vs the Branch Manager