Disposed
Sulochana v. Manicka Mudaliar (Deceased)
Madras HCCMP/20945/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
in SA.No.582 of 2007 TRNJ M/s.Sarvabhauman…
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
¶1
CMP.No.20945 of 2018 in
¶2
SA.No.582 of 2007
¶3
TRNJ
¶4
M/s.Sarvabhauman associates represent that they have filed vakalat for the proposed respondents.
¶5
Both Counsel present and heard. Counter not filed.
¶6
Considering the reasons given in the affidavit appended to the petition, they being acceptable and, in the interest of Juste, the petition is allowed.
¶7
Registry is directed to amend the appeal memorandum accoringly and post the matter after vacation.
¶8
26.04.2019
¶9
bga/aa
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- other
M/s.Sarvabhauman associates
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court