Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution. Appellants were absent; Second Appeal in S.A.No.1450 of 2003 was dismissed for want of prosecution along with costs.
Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 25.04.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN
S.A.No.1450 of 2003
For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : Ms.Vasudha Thiagarajan
JUDGMENT
In this matter, counsel for the appellants had already reported "no instructions". The appellants on being called and remaining absent, the registry was directed to list the matter on 25.04.2019 under the caption “for dismissal” by printing the name of the appellants in the cause list.
MEMORANDUM OF COSTS
SA.No.1450 of 2003
Respondents ( )Costs
Rs. P.
Stamp for Vakalatnama .. 10.00
Advocate's Fee on Rupees (F.C not received) Nil
Translation and Printing / Nil
Typing Charges ..
To be paid by the Petitioner 10.00
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS-IV)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
bga
To
1. The Principal District Court, Chengalpattu
2. The Subordinate Court, Madurantakam.
3. The Section Officer, V.R. Section,
High Court, Madras ( 2 copies)
+1 cc to M/s.C.S.Associates, Advocate, S.R.No.39811
+1 cc to Mr.R.Thiagarajan, Advocate, S.R.No.40272
S.A.No.1450 of 2003
KJ(CO)
SSM(28/06/2019)
T. Venkatesan
P. Thyagaraja Chettiyar
M. Jothi
G. Muthukrishnan
T. Ravindran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
