The court condoned a 120-day delay in filing an appeal, accepting reasons provided in the supporting affidavit, and directed the registry to number the appeal in order.
Delay of 120 days in filing the appeal was condoned; registry directed to number the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.18857 of 2016
C.M.P.No.18857 of 2016
in
W.A.No.SR39649 of 2012
N.KIRUBAKARAN, J. and P.VELMURUGAN, J.
(Order of the Court was made by N.KIRUBAKARAN,J.)
This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 120 days in filing
the appeal. Even though the petition has been filed by Mr.R.Muthaian,
learned Counsel for the petitioner, when the matter is called today, Mr.K.J.Sivakumar represents the matter as the learned Counsel for the petitioner.
2.It is seen that the 2nd respondent has been served and name has
been printed but none represented on behalf of the 2nd respondent. However, this Court is convinced with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition to condone the delay of 120 days in filing the
appeal and hence, this petition is ordered.
(N.K.K.,J.) (P.V.,J.) 26.09.2019
C.M.P.No.18857 of 2016
ay
Note: Registry is directed to number the appeal if it is otherwise in order.
N.KIRUBAKARAN, J.
and
P.VELMURUGAN, J.
ay
C.M.P.No.18857 of 2016
in
W.A.No.SR39649 of 2012
C.M.P.No.18857 of 2016
Dated:26.09.2019
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone the delay of 120 days in filing the appeal.
N.KIRUBAKARAN
P.VELMURUGAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
