The Management v. S.Haridoss
Case brief
What is this about?
C.M.P.No.16756 of 2019 in W.A.No.SR80311 of…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.16756 of 2019
C.M.P.No.16756 of 2019 in
W.A.No.SR80311 of 2019
N.KIRUBAKARAN, J. and P.VELMURUGAN, J.
(Order of the Court was made by N.KIRUBAKARAN,J.)
This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 235 days in preferring the appeal.
2.Even though the learned Counsel for the first respondent filed
counter affidavit and opposed in allowing this petition, this Court is convinced with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition to condone the delay of 235 days in preferring the appeal and
hence, this petition is ordered.
(N.K.K.,J.) (P.V.,J.) 26.09.2019
ay
Note: Registry is directed to number the appeal if
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court