The Management v. D.Saravanan
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition filed to condone 138 days' delay in preferring W.A.No.SR37145 of 2019. Court satisfied with affidavit reasons and allowed the petition.
What did the court decide?
Petition allowed; order noted; Registry to number appeal and name counsel.
What the court decided
C.M.P.No.16757 of 2019
C.M.P.No.16757 of 2019 in
W.A.No.SR37145 of 2019
N.KIRUBAKARAN, J.
and
P.VELMURUGAN, J.
(Order of the Court was made by N.KIRUBAKARAN,J.)
This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 138 days in
preferring the appeal.
2.This Court is satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in
support of the petition and hence, this petition is ordered.
(N.K.K.,J.) (P.V.,J.)
19.09.2019
ay
Note: Registry is directed to number the appeal if
it is otherwise in order and print the name of
Mr.S.T.Varadharajalu for R1 at the time of
admission.
C.M.P.No.16757 of 2019
N.KIRUBAKARAN, J.
and
P.VELMURUGAN, J.
ay
C.M.P.No.16757 of 2019
in
W.A.No.SR37145 of 2019
C.M.P.No.16757 of 2019
Dated:19.09.2019
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in preferring the appeal should be condoned.
Coram
N.KIRUBAKARAN
P.VELMURUGAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court