Leave to file a writ petition was granted on the ground that the petitioner had not received benefits from G.O.Ms.No.76 and is aggrieved by the quashing of an earlier executive order.
Leave to file the writ petition is granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.20225 of 2019 in
W.A.No.sr117622 of 2019 N.KIRUBAKARAN, J. and
P.VELMURUGAN, J.
(Order of the Court was made by N.Kirubakaran, J)
The petitioner is not a party to the Writ Petition No.17178 of 2018, who had already availed the benefits of G.O.Ms.No.76, Housing and Urban Development [UD4 (3)] Department, dated 14.06.2018 which was eventually quashed by the learned single Judge and therefore, he is aggrieved by the learned single Judge's order passed in W.P.No.17178 of 2018 on 10.12.2018. Therefore, the petitioner is entitled to leave.
2.Accordingly, the petition is ordered as prayed for.
(NKKJ) (PVJ) 18.09.2019
sai
Note:The Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is in order, and post the matter along with W.A.Nos.233, 1909, 1539 & 1534 of 2019.
1/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant leave to file a writ of certiorari to quash an earlier order.
Unknown Petitioner
N. Kirubakaran
P. Velmurugan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
